Ultimate magazine theme for WordPress.

Kyle Rittenhouse acquitted of all charges in 2020 Kenosha Shootings – CBS Chicago

CHICAGO (CBS) – Kyle Rittenhouse was acquitted of all charges Friday after shooting and killing three people in Kenosha last year.

Rittenhouse burst into tears and nearly collapsed when a clerk announced that the jury had found him not guilty of all charges. He had faced five charges, including charges of reckless first degree homicide, reckless first degree harm, premeditated first degree homicide and attempted first degree homicide. He faced life imprisonment if convicted.

CONTINUE READING: Irv Miller: Videos ‘Killed the Prosecutor’ in the Kyle Rittenhouse Trial

There was no question Rittenhouse shot someone, and the process boiled down to whether he was legitimately acting in self-defense. He was charged in connection with the shooting of three people in August 2020 during protests against the police shooting of Jacob Blake. Rittenhouse shot and killed Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber and wounded Gaige Großkreutz during the widespread riots in Kenosha after Blake was shot by police.

Huber’s fiancée stood praying in the courtroom doorway while she and other relatives of the men Rittenhouse had shot waited for the verdict.

Rittenhouse began to cry immediately after the full verdict was pronounced, fell forward and rested his head briefly on the defense table and slipped partially from his chair, his legs trembling as he sobbed. His lawyer rubbed Rittenhouse’s shoulders and told him to breathe while his family cried too.

His mother, Wendy Rittenhouse, gasped with delight, started crying, and hugged others after the verdict.

Meanwhile, the families of the men killed shook their heads and began to cry.

The jury was kept anonymous throughout the trial, and Schroeder told them that once their task was complete, they were not required to speak publicly, but they could do so if they wanted to.

Meanwhile, a relatively small crowd that had gathered outside the courthouse earlier in the day as the verdict spread, and dozens of people gathered on the courthouse steps by the afternoon.

Some Rittenhouse supporters chanted “Second Amendment” after his acquittal, while supporters of the men he shot complained of the innocent verdict.

Kenosha remained quiet throughout the trial, but Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers called the state’s National Guard to prepare the verdict.

The acquittal fell after about 26 hours of counseling over four days. Rittenhouse attorneys are due to speak on the ruling at their Racine offices on Friday. Prosecutors have announced that they will not speak to the media after the verdict.

During the two-week testimony, the jury heard from more than 30 witnesses.

Rittenhouse, who was 17 at the time of the shooting, took a stand during the trial, testifying that he acted in self-defense and never wanted to kill anyone.

“I did nothing wrong. I defended myself, ”said Rittenhouse.

Prosecutors had argued that Rittenhouse had instigated the violence that night as a ruthless vigilante who put himself in a situation he did not belong in.

CONTINUE READING: Chicago Bears Edge rusher Khalil Mack is placed on injured reserve with foot surgery

“You cannot claim self-defense against a threat you have created. That is crucial here. If you are the one threatening others, you lose your right to self-defense, “Kenosha County’s Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger said during the closing arguments.

However, some prosecution witnesses backed Rittenhouse’s self-defense claims.

For example, military veteran Ryan Balch, who said he was at Rittenhouse’s part of the night and also wore an AR-15-style rifle, told the jury that Rosenbaum threatened to kill them. Viedographer Richie McGinniss also testified that Rosenbaum started hunting Rittenhouse and grabbed his gun. Großkreutz himself also admitted that during his encounter with Rittenhouse he was carrying a loaded pistol that was pointing at the teenager when Rittenhouse shot him, although Großkreutz insisted that he did not intentionally point the gun at Rittenhouse and not him would have shot.

Before deliberations began Tuesday morning, the field of 18 jurors was reduced to 12 after their numbers were put on slips of paper in a lottery cup in the courtroom and Rittenhouse himself selected six slips of paper to be used to identify the alternate juror. The alternative jurors are three white men and three white women, so that the only colored person still sits on the jury of seven women and five men who decide on the verdict.

During their second day of trial, the jury spent approximately 45 minutes reviewing video evidence from the case. Problems related to the video prompted the defense to request a wrongful trial again.

Prosecutors said the jury should be able to watch each of the videos of the shootings as many times as they want, but defense attorneys declined to allow the jury to watch drone videos of the Rittenhouse shooting and Joseph Rosenbaum’s murder, and the defense team is aiming A wrongful trial of this video, prosecutors alleged they provided them with a lower quality version of the video, which was inappropriate.

“We received a compressed version that was not of the quality it was,” said defense attorney Corey Chirafisi. “That doesn’t seem fair to me.”

This was the second call for a misconduct that prosecutors rejected and labeled “inappropriate”.

Prosecutors said they sent the defense the same version of the video they received and believe the file was compressed during the transfer because it was transferred from a prosecutor’s Apple phone to a defender’s Android phone. When both sides later learned that the defense had received a lower quality version of the video, the prosecution made the higher quality version available to the defense.

Schroeder said he would let judges watch the drone video if they wanted to, but would also like to hear expert witnesses outside of the jury’s presence about the dispute over the quality of the video the defense team received, and if any Problems with handling the video, if an appeal is made, the case could fail.

“I felt queasy from the start, and now more than ever,” said Schroeder.

With the acquittal of Rittenhouse, the applications for failure are now irrelevant.

Before the jury began deliberations, Judge Bruce Schroeder dismissed charges of illegal gun possession against Rittenhouse.

While it was only a misconduct charge, possession of a dangerous weapon by someone under the age of 18 seemed the most likely number that resulted in a conviction for Rittenhouse, who was only 17 when he was in Kenosha. an AR-15 rifle carried and used on August 25, 2020 to shoot three men and kill two of them during a chaotic night of protests in Kenosha over the police shooting of Jacob Blake.

Defense attorneys argued that Wisconsin state law provides an exception that allows 17-year-olds to openly carry firearms other than short-barreled rifles with a barrel less than 16 “and an overall length less than 26”.

MORE NEWS: WATCH: Kyle Rittenhouse breaks down as a not guilty verdict

Schroeder said the Wisconsin law was badly written and that the shorter barrel size of the rifle Rittenhouse carried meant he was not breaking that law. Although prosecutors said they disagreed with the judge’s interpretation of the law, they conceded that Rittenhouse’s gun was not a short-barreled rifle, and Schroeder denied that count.

Comments are closed.